lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZChKkc6VS6NHPcQADns_npzv-1OH72aqNM0aB6qFoPP+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2016 17:01:38 +0300
From:	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
To:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] iio: magn: Add support for BMM150 magnetometer

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 27/04/16 15:55, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com> wrote:
>>> BMM150 is register compatible with magnetometer part of
>>> BMC156.
>>>
>>> Datasheet is at:
>>> http://www.mouser.com/ds/2/783/BST-BMM150-DS001-01-786480.pdf
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>> Lucas let me know if it works for you. I don't have yet the BMM150 evaluation
>>> board. It should be available in few weeks.
>>>
>>> I'll just leave this patch here in case anyone steps in to test it.
>>
>> It will take a while for my test board to arrive here, so expect delay
>> on testing this.
> I'm dropping this from my list of outstanding patches for now.
> It'll resurface when you guys restart the thread.

Got the shuttle board and basic tests with generic_buffer seem to work fine.

Jonathan can you pick this up if no other comments?

thanks,
Daniel.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ