[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1463580074.1575.7.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 08:01:14 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, jack@...e.cz, david@...morbit.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, axboe@...com, hch@...radead.org,
boaz@...xistor.com, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, micah.parrish@....com,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove unused blkdev_dax_capable() function
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 09:54 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The change from blkdev_dax_capable() to bdev_dax_capable() removed the
> only user of the former, so we now get a build warning:
>
> fs/block_dev.c:1244:13: error: 'blkdev_dax_capable' defined but not used
> [-Werror=unused-function]
> static bool blkdev_dax_capable(struct block_device *bdev)
>
> This removes the now-unused function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: a8078b1fc616 ("block: Update blkdev_dax_capable() for
> consistency")
:
> It's not entirely from the patch description what the intention was here
> in keeping two slightly different implementations of the same function
> in one file, my best guess is that it was not intentional and we should
> just remove this.
Thanks for the build fix. Looks like there was a conflict
between 8044aae6f374 and a8078b1fc616d, which resulted this build error.
Both patches moved blkdev_dax_capable() from block/ioctl.c
to fs/block_dev.c.
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Thanks,
-Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists