linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] doc: self-protection: provide initial details

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jK=nEMmhAWX+YVwyeeC_uzDgg5NXnvkY-PO=sq7ZAkPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 21:44:02 -0400
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: self-protection: provide initial details

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2016 19:27:28 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> This document attempts to codify the intent around kernel self-protection
>> along with discussion of both existing and desired technologies, with
>> attention given to the rationale behind them, and the expectations of
>> their usage.
>
> I've applied this to the docs tree.  In the process, I took the liberty
> of applying the suggestions from Randy, hope you don't mind...

Ah, thanks! I'll send a follow-up. I had a suggestion for another
section and a typo fix.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security