[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <146358425242.8596.10719266273243587481.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:10:52 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, ramana.radhakrishnan@....com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/15] tty: ldsem_cmpxchg() should use cmpxchg() not
atomic_long_cmpxchg()
ldsem_cmpxchg() should use cmpxchg() not atomic_long_cmpxchg() since the
variable it is wangling isn't an atomic_long_t.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
index 1bf8ed13f827..dc27b285ba4f 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static inline long ldsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct ld_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline int ldsem_cmpxchg(long *old, long new, struct ld_semaphore *sem)
{
- long tmp = atomic_long_cmpxchg(&sem->count, *old, new);
+ long tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, *old, new);
if (tmp == *old) {
*old = new;
return 1;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists