linux-kernel - Re: CQ and RDMA READ/WRITE APIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG53R5VSjz_G1adajcoUdgh3Sf1yyKf7UREFoNF9x_V+N6oR6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2016 08:18:49 +0530
From:	Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
To:	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc:	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
	"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CQ and RDMA READ/WRITE APIs

Hi Doug,

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com> wrote:
> Nice catch there Bart.  That was well before my role as maintainer and
> so settles things well enough for me.  IOW, I don't feel I need to worry
> about trying to maintain the dual license nature of the RDMA stack as it
> was broken long before I took over.  Thanks for pointing that out.
>

Does it mean we can submit new code files under GPL only license?
I submitted RDMA cgroup related code in ib_core under GPLv2 only license.
Existing files which are calling those new APIs will continue to be
dual license (similar to CQ and RDMA APIs)?

Parav