lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 10:31:38 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 omap 3/6] arm: Add _rcuidle tracepoints to allow clk_core_disable() use from idle On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 05:24:51PM +0200, Mason wrote: > On 16/05/2016 20:50, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > >> stack backtrace: > >> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc5-next-20160426+ #1114 > >> Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree) > >> [<c0110290>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c3a8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > >> [<c010c3a8>] (show_stack) from [<c047fd68>] (dump_stack+0xb0/0xe4) > >> [<c047fd68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0631618>] (clk_core_disable+0x17c/0x348) > >> [<c0631618>] (clk_core_disable) from [<c0632774>] (clk_disable+0x24/0x30) > >> [<c0632774>] (clk_disable) from [<c0120590>] (_disable_clocks+0x18/0x7c) > >> [<c0120590>] (_disable_clocks) from [<c0121680>] (_idle+0x12c/0x230) > >> [<c0121680>] (_idle) from [<c0121b4c>] (omap_hwmod_idle+0x24/0x44) > >> [<c0121b4c>] (omap_hwmod_idle) from [<c0122c24>] (omap_device_idle+0x3c/0x90) > >> [<c0122c24>] (omap_device_idle) from [<c052cc00>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60) > >> [<c052cc00>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c052cc54>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x80) > >> [<c052cc54>] (rpm_callback) from [<c052d150>] (rpm_suspend+0x100/0x768) > >> [<c052d150>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c052ec58>] (__pm_runtime_suspend+0x64/0x84) > >> [<c052ec58>] (__pm_runtime_suspend) from [<c04bf25c>] (omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle+0x5 > >> c/0x70) > >> [<c04bf25c>] (omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle) from [<c0125568>] (omap_sram_idle+0x140/0x2 > >> 44) > > Wouldn't the stack trace look better without the word wrap? :-) Truth in advertising!!! ;-) Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists