[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160518181509.GA8664@svinekod>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 19:15:09 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
dennis.chen@....com, jiangshanlai@...il.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, steve.capper@....com, will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] rcu: tree: correctly handle sparse possible CPUs
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 02:02:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> It's the missing "possible_" that Mark mentioned in his reply on Friday.
Actually, that was this morning. My VM on my laptop had a stale date due to
suspend/resume of the host. :/
I should be back at a real computer by Friday, and can respin the patch to fix
the issue Andrey pointed out.
Thanks for the fixup, and sorry for the confusion!
Mark.
> Please fold the fixup below into the patch if you want to get it to build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index fd6b0f701bed..bb137b0ef6f3 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
> return;
> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL))
> return;
> - for_each_leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu, bit)
> + for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu, bit)
> if ((mask & bit) && cpu != outgoingcpu)
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cm);
> if (cpumask_weight(cm) == 0)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists