linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86/UV, x86/efi: Re-factor efi_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160518191332.GE242721@stormcage.americas.sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2016 14:13:32 -0500
From:	Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
To:	Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
	Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86/UV, x86/efi: Re-factor efi_call_virt for
 general use

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 02:11:38PM -0500, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> Let me know what everybody thinks!

I realized right as I sent these that I should've included prefixes on
the individual patches.  I have a feeling we'll need a v2 anyways, so
I'll clean that up then.

- Alex