linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: conservative: Remove declaration of cs_dbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gbFaEpRbSXaEr8X5_DjcuWParKdS+mUshmKrLu7xnRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2016 23:03:18 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: conservative: Remove declaration of cs_dbs_gov

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> The code doesn't use 'cs_dbs_gov' anymore before it is defined and the
> extra line for declaring it can be removed.

This sort of conflicts with a patch I've just posted
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9122121/) and I'd prefer to go
with that one if that's not a big deal.