[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160518211043.qqzesbrmbbr7xba2@floor.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 17:10:43 -0400
From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
CC: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Subject: incoming merge conflict to linux-next
Hi Stephen,
Dave Sterba's tree in linux-next has a few btrfs patches that we're not
sending yet into Linus. We've got an update for Josef's enospc work
that'll get sent in next week.
So he prepped a pull for me that merged up a number of his branches but
didn't include Josef's new code. It has all been in -next for some
time, and then I put some fixes from Filipe on top.
Long story short, you'll get a merge conflict from my next branch:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next
I've got the sample resolution in next-merge:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge
Please let us know if you have any problems.
-chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists