[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160518222442.GA15516@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 15:24:42 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Sell, Timothy C" <Timothy.Sell@...sys.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"timur@...escale.com" <timur@...escale.com>,
"galak@...nel.crashing.org" <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Kershner, David A" <David.Kershner@...sys.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Arfvidson, Erik" <Erik.Arfvidson@...sys.com>,
"hofrat@...dl.org" <hofrat@...dl.org>,
"dzickus@...hat.com" <dzickus@...hat.com>,
"Curtin, Alexander Paul" <Alexander.Curtin@...sys.com>,
"janani.rvchndrn@...il.com" <janani.rvchndrn@...il.com>,
"sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
"prarit@...hat.com" <prarit@...hat.com>,
"Binder, David Anthony" <David.Binder@...sys.com>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
*S-Par-Maintainer <SParMaintainer@...sys.com>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: new driver for drivers/virt/?
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:11:46AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2016, Sell, Timothy C wrote:
> > We have a bus driver currently in drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/ that
> > we are trying to get out of staging and into the kernel proper. Since
> > "visorbus" is a driver to host a virtual bus presented to a Linux guest
> > in a hypervisor environment (refer to
> > drivers/staging/unisys/Documentation/overview.txt for more details),
> > Greg KH and Jes Sorensen have suggested the possibility that drivers/virt/
> > might be a good place for visorbus. But right now, we see that the only
> > driver under drivers/virt/ is the Freescale hypervisor environment, which
> > made us wonder whether this was really the correct place.
> >
> > Would you have any guidance for us?
> > Our intent is to push our visorbus out of staging immediately following
> > the current merge window.
>
> What's the problem with Gregs and Jes suggestion? I don't see any.
Neither do I, odd that they wanted a third opinion :(
> There is bigger fish to fry than the final place of this driver. I had just a
> peek at the staging code and there is enough stuff which wants to be cleaned
> up before moving anywhere. I don't have time to do a proper review now, but
> here are a few hints upfront:
<snip>
I don't think anyone has given a good review of the code yet, I know
it's been a long time for me. It's on my todo list, but that's not
going to happen until way after 4.7-rc1 is out. Thanks for this initial
list.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists