linux-kernel - Re: [GIT] Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 May 2016 02:20:03 -0600
From:	Reinoud Koornstra <reinoudkoornstra@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linuxwifi <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
	"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	"egrumbach@...il.com" <egrumbach@...il.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> From what I can tell, there's a merge bug in commit 909b27f70643,
>> where David seems to have lost some of the changes to
>> iwl_mvm_set_tx_cmd().
>>
>> I do not know if that's the reason for the problem I see. But I will test.
>
> Yes. The attached patch that fixes the incorrect merge seems to fix
> things for me.
>
> That should mean that the assumption that this problem existed in v4.6
> too was wrong, because the incorrect merge came in later. I think
> Luciano mis-understood "v4.6+" to mean plain v4.6.
>
> Reinoud Koornstra, does this patch fix things for you too?

Indeed, I meant 4.6+, not 4.6.
The patch you attached doesn't change existing code for me in 4.6+ as
these two lines are already in there.
Thanks,

Reinoud.

>
>                        Linus