[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160519101921.3a45e559@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 10:19:21 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Subject: Re: incoming merge conflict to linux-next
Hi Chris,
On Wed, 18 May 2016 17:10:43 -0400 Chris Mason <clm@...com> wrote:
>
> Dave Sterba's tree in linux-next has a few btrfs patches that we're not
> sending yet into Linus. We've got an update for Josef's enospc work
> that'll get sent in next week.
>
> So he prepped a pull for me that merged up a number of his branches but
> didn't include Josef's new code. It has all been in -next for some
> time, and then I put some fixes from Filipe on top.
>
> Long story short, you'll get a merge conflict from my next branch:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next
>
> I've got the sample resolution in next-merge:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git next-merge
>
> Please let us know if you have any problems.
A bit of a mess, but I sorted it out, thanks for the test merge.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists