[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1463657104.18194.154.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 04:25:04 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2] tuntap: correctly wake up process during uninit
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 13:36 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to check dev->reg_state against NETREG_REGISTERED after each
> time we are woke up. But after commit 9e641bdcfa4e ("net-tun:
> restructure tun_do_read for better sleep/wakeup efficiency"), it uses
> skb_recv_datagram() which does not check dev->reg_state. This will
> result if we delete a tun/tap device after a process is blocked in the
> reading. The device will wait for the reference count which was held
> by that process for ever.
>
> Fixes this by using RCV_SHUTDOWN which will be checked during
> sk_recv_datagram() before trying to wake up the process during uninit.
>
> Fixes: 9e641bdcfa4e ("net-tun: restructure tun_do_read for better
> sleep/wakeup efficiency")
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists