[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160519161923.GB18909@krava>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 18:19:23 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
wangnan0@...wei.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
eranian@...gle.com, namhyung@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
tumanova@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
penberg@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] perf tools: Promote proper messages for
cross-platform unwind
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:50:10AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:47:38AM +0000, He Kuang escreveu:
> > Currently, perf script uses host unwind methods to parse perf.data
> > callchain info regardless of the target architecture. So we get wrong
> > result and no promotion when unwinding callchains of x86(32-bit) on
>
> What you mean by "promotion" here? Can you use some other synonym so
> that I can make sense of this description?
I'd say something like: s/and no promotion/without any warning/
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists