[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160520203515.d1e2e752f59fcc3d3e72e69c@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 20:35:15 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Anju T <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
ananth@...ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
paulus@...ba.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
jkenisto@...ibm.com, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] arch/powerpc : optprobes for powerpc core
On Thu, 19 May 2016 13:19:42 +0530
Anju T <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> +void arch_unoptimize_kprobes(struct list_head *oplist,
> >> + struct list_head *done_list)
> >> +{
> >> + struct optimized_kprobe *op;
> >> + struct optimized_kprobe *tmp;
> >> +
> >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(op, tmp, oplist, list) {
> >> + arch_unoptimize_kprobe(op);
> >> + list_move(&op->list, done_list);
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +int arch_within_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
> >> + unsigned long addr)
> >> +{
> > Please make sure addr != op->kp.addr and addr is aligned.
>
> The only case this check will succeed is if kp.addr is not a multiple of 4, which is not a valid address at all on
> Power.So should we again check here for that?
Ah, right. OK, so we may not need that.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists