[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPTae5+0v_Bec_=53Abuzxfq4raNZCt8eJHYMNeF=Pdbu===yA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 19:20:26 -0700
From: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: path-lookup inconsistency ?
Hi,
I mounted overlayfs at /
My cat /proc/mounts looks like the following.
# cat /proc/mounts
/dev/root / squashfs ro,seclabel,relatime 0 0
..
overlayfs / overlay
rw,relatime,lowerdir=/,upperdir=/cache/upper,workdir=/cache/working 0
0
The original blockdevice at fs root is squashfs formatted so doesnt
support write operations. I mounted overlayfs on fs root to cache the
writes made.
While in /, the filesystem does not allow me to create files/directories,
if I dont prefix it with ".." directive.
hikey:/ # mkdir test
mkdir: 'testt12': Read-only file system
hikey:/ # mkdir ../test
"mkdir ../test" command succeeds.
I traced through the fs/namei.c code to notice that __follow_mount_rcu
does not get called when I execute "mkdir test" whereas, it gets called from
the follow_dotdot_rcu when I execute "mkdir ../test"
What is the expected behavior ? Should "mkdir test" and "mkdir ../test"
both succeed ?
Similar inconsistency is found with "ls" and "ls .." as well while in fs root.
Thanks,
Badhri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists