linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/fpu/state: Fix XSAVES issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 May 2016 19:41:20 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/fpu/state: Fix XSAVES issues - Part 1


* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:12:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Hm, the series does not apply cleanly:
> > 
> >  patching file arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> >  patching file arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> >  patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
> >  patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> >  patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> >  Hunk #4 FAILED at 552.
> >  1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> > 
> > which suggests that this series isn't against a recent x86 tree, right?
> 
> That was based on the latest upstream kernel.  I also keep a version based
> on tip/master.  Would it work?

Yes, tip/master would be fine, or upstream bc231d9ede99 that has the x86 tree 
already merged.

Thanks,

	Ingo.