[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-7e4c1498130d7b6c26e6669839af4c7e321c9fec@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 10:45:41 -0700
From: tip-bot for Chris Ryder <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chris.ryder@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
acme@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
will.deacon@....com, pawel.moll@....com
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf annotate: Sort list of recognised
instructions
Commit-ID: 7e4c1498130d7b6c26e6669839af4c7e321c9fec
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/7e4c1498130d7b6c26e6669839af4c7e321c9fec
Author: Chris Ryder <chris.ryder@....com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:59:46 +0100
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Fri, 20 May 2016 11:43:57 -0300
perf annotate: Sort list of recognised instructions
Currently the list of instructions recognised by perf annotate has to be
explicitly written in sorted order. This makes it easy to make mistakes
when adding new instructions. Sort the list of instructions on first
access.
Signed-off-by: Chris Ryder <chris.ryder@....com>
Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4268febaf32f47f322c166fb2fe98cfec7041e11.1463676839.git.chris.ryder@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 3d9f2ca..7e5a1e8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -354,9 +354,6 @@ static struct ins_ops nop_ops = {
.scnprintf = nop__scnprintf,
};
-/*
- * Must be sorted by name!
- */
static struct ins instructions[] = {
{ .name = "add", .ops = &mov_ops, },
{ .name = "addl", .ops = &mov_ops, },
@@ -449,18 +446,39 @@ static struct ins instructions[] = {
{ .name = "xbeginq", .ops = &jump_ops, },
};
-static int ins__cmp(const void *name, const void *insp)
+static int ins__key_cmp(const void *name, const void *insp)
{
const struct ins *ins = insp;
return strcmp(name, ins->name);
}
+static int ins__cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
+{
+ const struct ins *ia = a;
+ const struct ins *ib = b;
+
+ return strcmp(ia->name, ib->name);
+}
+
+static void ins__sort(void)
+{
+ const int nmemb = ARRAY_SIZE(instructions);
+
+ qsort(instructions, nmemb, sizeof(struct ins), ins__cmp);
+}
+
static struct ins *ins__find(const char *name)
{
const int nmemb = ARRAY_SIZE(instructions);
+ static bool sorted;
+
+ if (!sorted) {
+ ins__sort();
+ sorted = true;
+ }
- return bsearch(name, instructions, nmemb, sizeof(struct ins), ins__cmp);
+ return bsearch(name, instructions, nmemb, sizeof(struct ins), ins__key_cmp);
}
int symbol__annotate_init(struct map *map __maybe_unused, struct symbol *sym)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists