linux-kernel - Mount namespace "dominant peer group"?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 May 2016 16:24:18 -0500
From:	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Cc:	mtk.manpages@...il.com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Subject: Mount namespace "dominant peer group"?

Hello Miklos,

I'm working on some better documentation of mount namespaces,
and there's a detail that puzzles me, and I hope you might be 
able to help, since you added the detail...

In Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt there is this text in the
description of /proc/PID/mountinfo:

[[
Parsers should ignore all unrecognised optional fields.  Currently the
possible optional fields are:

shared:X  mount is shared in peer group X
master:X  mount is slave to peer group X
propagate_from:X  mount is slave and receives propagation from peer group X (*)
unbindable  mount is unbindable

(*) X is the closest dominant peer group under the process's root.  If
X is the immediate master of the mount, or if there's no dominant peer 
group under the same root, then only the "master:X" field is present
and not the "propagate_from:X" field.
]]

What is a dominant peer group, as distinct from the immediate master?

I can see in fs/proc_namespaces.c that there is this distinction made:

[[
        /* Tagged fields ("foo:X" or "bar") */
        if (IS_MNT_SHARED(r))
                seq_printf(m, " shared:%i", r->mnt_group_id);
        if (IS_MNT_SLAVE(r)) {
                int master = r->mnt_master->mnt_group_id;
                int dom = get_dominating_id(r, &p->root);
                seq_printf(m, " master:%i", master);
                if (dom && dom != master)
                        seq_printf(m, " propagate_from:%i", dom);
        }
]]

But I can't relate that to some user-space semantics. I suppose another
way of asking my question is: how could I create a slave that is
propagating from a peer group other than it's immediate master?

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/