lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 19:30:59 -0700 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>, Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, ggherdovich@...e.com, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> Subject: Re: sem_lock() vs qspinlocks On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote: > > I can verify that this patch fixes the issue. Ok, I've applied it to my tree. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists