lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 20 May 2016 19:30:59 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	Boqun Feng <>,
	Manfred Spraul <>,
	Waiman Long <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,,
	Mel Gorman <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
	Paul McKenney <>,
	Will Deacon <>
Subject: Re: sem_lock() vs qspinlocks

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <> wrote:
> I can verify that this patch fixes the issue.

Ok, I've applied it to my tree.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists