[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2gVTTfGLoAZR3w0ofST8FrmPtiXYCAq4b6xvkyJbKAfiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 15:21:40 -0400
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Pass kernel thread parameters in fork_frame
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>> Instead of setting up a fake pt_regs context, put the kernel thread
>> function pointer and arg into the unused callee-restored registers
>> of struct fork_frame.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
>
> Seems reasonable. Can you make sure you explicitly test with
> something that uses the usermodehelper mechanism?
>
> --Andy
kernel_init() does the same thing to spawn init, so it wouldn't boot otherwise.
--
Brian Gerst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists