[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2itNtUWgFRZD+Oe8_LGpOaxRkHjtcsmAMUX9we3YBaxkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 22:19:11 -0400
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: Save return value from kernel_thread
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>> Kernel threads should always return zero on success after calling do_execve(). The
>> two existing cases in the kernel (kernel_init() and call_usermodehelper_exec_async())
>> correctly do this. Save a few bytes by storing EAX/RAX instead of an immediate zero.
>> Also fix the 64-bit case which should save the full 64-bits.
>
> Does this have any additional motivation beyond cleanup and fixing an
> inconsequential bug? I.e. does the rest of your series need this?
>
> --Andy
It's just a minor cleanup, not necessary.
--
Brian Gerst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists