linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: Save return value from kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 21 May 2016 22:19:11 -0400
From:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: Save return value from kernel_thread

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>> Kernel threads should always return zero on success after calling do_execve().  The
>> two existing cases in the kernel (kernel_init() and call_usermodehelper_exec_async())
>> correctly do this.  Save a few bytes by storing EAX/RAX instead of an immediate zero.
>> Also fix the 64-bit case which should save the full 64-bits.
>
> Does this have any additional motivation beyond cleanup and fixing an
> inconsequential bug?  I.e. does the rest of your series need this?
>
> --Andy

It's just a minor cleanup, not necessary.

--
Brian Gerst