[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1463967439-13354-2-git-send-email-zhengsq@rock-chips.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:37:15 +0800
From: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@...k-chips.com>
To: joro@...tes.org, heiko@...ech.de
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, Simon <xxm@...k-chips.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] iommu/rockchip: fix devm_request_irq and devm_free_irq parameter
From: Simon <xxm@...k-chips.com>
When rk_iommu_attach_device or rk_iommu_detach_device be called, the second
parameter "dev" represent the device who own the iommu, so it is not resonable
using "dev" for devm_request_irq's first parameter. To avoid potential error,
we must use iommu device itself "iommu->dev" instead, the same as devm_free_irq.
Signed-off-by: Simon <xxm@...k-chips.com>
---
drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
index c7d6156..ec0ce62 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
iommu->domain = domain;
- ret = devm_request_irq(dev, iommu->irq, rk_iommu_irq,
+ ret = devm_request_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq, rk_iommu_irq,
IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), iommu);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static void rk_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
}
rk_iommu_disable_stall(iommu);
- devm_free_irq(dev, iommu->irq, iommu);
+ devm_free_irq(iommu->dev, iommu->irq, iommu);
iommu->domain = NULL;
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists