[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABwW5n=M3HNxT=5556fRfx4_yup3FwbaLBY5AkDOoa0EPSyK_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 12:07:31 +0200
From: Mathias Kresin <openwrt@...sin.me>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
Cc: "Mehrtens, Hauke" <hauke.mehrtens@...el.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 RFC] net/phy: Add Lantiq PHY driver
2016-05-23 11:49 GMT+02:00 Alexander Stein
<alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>:
>> The registers are set to some reset values after the chip is coming out of
>> reset, but we should set them all to the same value, Mathias said that all
>> except for one board he knows are using only one LED per port, but they are
>> often using different LED pins, I will change my patch.
>
> One LED per port? I would think of using one RJ45 socket per port which
> usually have 2 LEDs.
The majority of the CPEs I'm talking about, do not have any leds at
the back side RJ45 socket. They are using a single led at the front
for status indication.
I'm only aware of one CPE that has two LEDs at the RJ45 socket.
Mathias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists