lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5742E839.3040804@mev.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 23 May 2016 12:23:37 +0100
From:	Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"3.8+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev: fix possible arithmetic overflow for
 multi-transfer message

On 23/05/16 12:15, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:50:35AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk> wrote:
>>> `spidev_message()` sums the lengths of the individual SPI transfers to
>>> determine the overall SPI message length.  It restricts the total
>>> length, returning an error if too long, but it does not check for
>
> As documented in SubmittingPatches please send patches to the
> maintainers for the code you would like to change.  The normal kernel
> workflow is that people apply patches from their inboxes, if they aren't
> copied they are likely to not see the patch at all and it is much more
> difficult to apply patches.
>

In this case, Dmitry was replying to my patch that has already been 
applied over a year ago. :)

-- 
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd.    E-mail: <abbotti@....co.uk> )=-
-=(                          Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/  )=-

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ