lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXHx=MFuLgwx6PegWOLeDyS5S_640AK=os4kS7oO=22zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 May 2016 10:05:30 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86-32, kgdb: Don't use thread.ip in sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs()

On May 21, 2016 9:04 AM, "Brian Gerst" <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Match 64-bit and set gdb_regs[GDB_PC] to zero.  thread.ip is always the
> same point in the scheduler (except for newly forked processes), and will
> be removed in a future patch.

Seems reasonable to me.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ