[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160523180455.GC32715@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 20:04:56 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: move page_ext_init after all struct pages are
initialized
On Mon 23-05-16 09:42:00, Shi, Yang wrote:
> On 5/23/2016 12:31 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 20-05-16 08:41:09, Shi, Yang wrote:
> > > On 5/20/2016 6:16 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 19-05-16 15:13:26, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> > > > > index b3c6e36..2075faf 100644
> > > > > --- a/init/main.c
> > > > > +++ b/init/main.c
> > > > > @@ -606,7 +606,6 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
> > > > > initrd_start = 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > > #endif
> > > > > - page_ext_init();
> > > > > debug_objects_mem_init();
> > > > > kmemleak_init();
> > > > > setup_per_cpu_pageset();
> > > > > @@ -1004,6 +1003,8 @@ static noinline void __init kernel_init_freeable(void)
> > > > > sched_init_smp();
> > > > >
> > > > > page_alloc_init_late();
> > > > > + /* Initialize page ext after all struct pages are initializaed */
> > > > > + page_ext_init();
> > > > >
> > > > > do_basic_setup();
> > > >
> > > > I might be missing something but don't we have the same problem with
> > > > CONFIG_FLATMEM? page_ext_init_flatmem is called way earlier. Or
> > > > CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is never enabled for CONFIG_FLATMEM?
> > >
> > > Yes, CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG which
> > > depends on SPARSEMEM. So, this config is not valid for FLATMEM at all.
> >
> > Well
> > config MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> > bool "Allow for memory hot-add"
> > depends on SPARSEMEM || X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
> > depends on ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> >
> > I wasn't really sure about X86_64_ACPI_NUMA dependency branch which
> > depends on X86_64 && NUMA && ACPI && PCI and that didn't sound like
> > SPARSEMEM only. If the FLATMEM shouldn't exist with
>
> Actually, FLATMEMT depends on !NUMA.
Ahh, OK, you are right! Thanks for the clarification.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists