[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201605240022.28140@pali>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:22:28 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"D. Jared Dominguez" <Jared_Dominguez@...l.com>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dell-rbtn: Ignore ACPI notifications if device is suspended
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 00:17:15 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:06:03AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 23 May 2016 23:26:55 Darren Hart wrote:
> > > I've queued this. Thanks for your patience.
> >
> > Ok, In that case I would update comments in patch to try it more
> > clear what code is doing.
>
> I thought I had your approval on this one Pali. Apologies if that was
> not the case. Did I miss a change request from you?
>
> If so, please point me at it, and I'll dequeue this one and wait for
> an updated one.
I just wanted to review that code from somebody else and decide if
accept it or not. Because I was not sure if it is OK...
But there was no objection, so patch is OK.
And I pointed that patch could have better comments to describe what it
is doing as at first time I was confused.
So I believe that you can update patch in your queue with new version
which just change comments in source code (without functional changes).
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists