[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160524005049.GA22049@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 17:50:49 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, acme@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf pt: Mark PT return events as "return"
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:05:08PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 20/05/16 22:52, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > With perf script --itrace=cr we can synthesize calls and returns out of
> > a PT log. However both calls and returns are marked with the same event,
> > called branches. This makes it difficult to read and post process,
> > because calls and returns are somewhat diffferent.
>
> Did you consider the sample flags?
> e.g.
True. But reporting it in the event name looks nicer, so I think the patch
is still useful.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
Powered by blists - more mailing lists