linux-kernel - [PATCH RT] arm: lazy preempt: correct resched condition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160524113036.GA27094@linutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2016 13:30:36 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT] arm: lazy preempt: correct resched condition

If we get out of preempt_schedule_irq() then we check for NEED_RESCHED
and call the former function again if set because the preemption counter
has be zero at this point.
However the counter for lazy-preempt might not be zero therefore we have
to check the counter before looking at the need_resched_lazy flag.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
index d66b1aef2083..d044cea59f54 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
@@ -244,7 +244,11 @@ ENDPROC(__irq_svc)
 	bne	1b
 	tst	r0, #_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
 	reteq	r8				@ go again
-	b	1b
+	ldr	r0, [tsk, #TI_PREEMPT_LAZY]	@ get preempt lazy count
+	teq	r0, #0				@ if preempt lazy count != 0
+	beq	1b
+	ret	r8				@ go again
+
 #endif
 
 __und_fault:
-- 
2.8.1