linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: stats: Walk online CPUs with CPU offline/online locked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160524121717.GY17585@vireshk-i7>
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2016 17:47:17 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: stats: Walk online CPUs with CPU
 offline/online locked

On 24-05-16, 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I don't really get it why you don't like get/put_online_cpus() so much.

Not that I don't like them, I just wanted to see if its possible to
work without any additional locking.

Anyway, so the first version of your patch did the get_online_cpus()
around a bigger section of the code instead of just the
for_each_online_cpu() loop. Should we change that? 

-- 
viresh