[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160524125018.GT3825@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 05:50:18 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgalbraith@...e.de, ahh@...gle.com,
bsegall@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, morten.rasmussen@....com, pjt@...gle.com,
pkondeti@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, byungchul.park@....com,
mingo@...nel.org, rgkernel@...il.com
Subject: Re: Bisection: Lost wakeups from b5179ac70de8
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:04:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 07:04:10AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello, Peter,
> >
> > Current mainline doesn't do well with RCU torture testing, and the
> > symptom once again looks like lost wakeups. Thankfully, this time each
> > run takes only about an hour, and the false-positive/-negative rate
> > is negligible. This means that for the first time ever, "git bisect"
> > actually did something useful for me. The first bad commit is:
> >
> > b5179ac70de8 ("sched/fair: Prepare to fix fairness problems on migration").
> >
>
> Yeah, we have a patch for that.. I'll go writes a Changelog for it and
> put it to sched/urgent.
>
> See lkml.kernel.org/r/20160523091907.GD15728@...ktop.ger.corp.intel.com
Thank you, will give it a shot.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists