linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1464094742.5939.46.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2016 05:59:02 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 7/8] pipe: account to kmemcg

On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 11:49 +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Pipes can consume a significant amount of system memory, hence they
> should be accounted to kmemcg.
> 
> This patch marks pipe_inode_info and anonymous pipe buffer page
> allocations as __GFP_ACCOUNT so that they would be charged to kmemcg.
> Note, since a pipe buffer page can be "stolen" and get reused for other
> purposes, including mapping to userspace, we clear PageKmemcg thus
> resetting page->_mapcount and uncharge it in anon_pipe_buf_steal, which
> is introduced by this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> ---
>  fs/pipe.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
> index 0d3f5165cb0b..4b32928f5426 100644
> --- a/fs/pipe.c
> +++ b/fs/pipe.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>  #include <linux/audit.h>
>  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>  #include <linux/fcntl.h>
> +#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/ioctls.h>
> @@ -137,6 +138,22 @@ static void anon_pipe_buf_release(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>  		put_page(page);
>  }
>  
> +static int anon_pipe_buf_steal(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> +			       struct pipe_buffer *buf)
> +{
> +	struct page *page = buf->page;
> +
> +	if (page_count(page) == 1) {

This looks racy : some cpu could have temporarily elevated page count.

> +		if (memcg_kmem_enabled()) {
> +			memcg_kmem_uncharge(page, 0);
> +			__ClearPageKmemcg(page);
> +		}
> +		__SetPageLocked(page);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +