lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1464053619.18442.11.camel@mtksdaap41> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:33:39 +0800 From: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <eddie.huang@...iatek.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: mt6397: Constify struct regulator_ops Hi Mark, On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 12:32 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:30:16PM +0800, Henry Chen wrote: > > Consitify the structure of regulator operations. > > Oh, actually the mode setting patch does apply but it depends on this > one (which was sent after...). It would have been better to send a > patch series for the driver and separately a patch series for the core, > the driver changes are orthogonal to the core ones here. Got it. Sorry for unawareness of the dependency issue and thanks for kindly reminder.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists