lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALCETrWsO3h-trontU121d-2YnpJ=7aqYDngzr4PpAeFfC14Sw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 18:37:46 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> Subject: Re: x86: A process doesn't stop on hw breakpoints sometimes On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We use breakpoints on CRIU to stop a processes before calling > rt_sigreturn and we found that sometimes a process runs through a > break-point without stopping on it. > > https://github.com/xemul/criu/issues/162 > > > A small reproducer is attached. It forks a child, stops it, sets a > breakpoint, executes a child, waits when it stops on the breakpoint. I > execute it a few times concurrently and wait a few minutes. > > https://asciinema.org/a/006l3u5v82ubbkfy9fto07agd > > I know that it can be reproduced on: > AMD A10 Micro-6700T > Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-5200U CPU @ 2.20GHz > Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4600U CPU @ 2.10GHz > > so It doesn't look like a bug in a processor. I'm guessing you're either hitting a subtle bug in the mess that is breakpoint handling or you're hitting a bug in perf's context switch code. Given that the breakpoint gets missed many times in a row, this is presumably either a bug in breakpoint programming (i.e. the thing isn't actually set in dr0/dr7) or a bug in the bp state tracking. If it were a bug in RF flag handling, I'd expect it to skip once and trip the second time through. All that being said, I stared at the code for a while and I don't see the bug. I can trigger this quite rarely on a VM, and it's not fun to debug :( --Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists