lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2016 10:42:31 -0400
From:	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, Ocean HY1 He <hehy1@...ovo.com>
Cc:	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"wangyijing@...wei.com" <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"prarit@...hat.com" <prarit@...hat.com>,
	"jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>,
	Nagananda Chumbalkar <nchumbalkar@...ovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: fix reverse ASPM L0s assignment of upstream and
 downstream

On 5/24/2016 7:53 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:29:44AM +0000, Ocean HY1 He wrote:
>> > In pcie_config_aspm_link(), when convert ASPM state to
>> > upstream/downstream ASPM register state, the upstream variable and
>> > dwsream variable are reversed. This causes PCI/E link enter ASPM L0s
>> > even it should be disabled and PCI/E endpoint may reset randomly.
> Random resets of an endpoint sounds like a pretty bad problem.  Do you
> have a bug report?  We've had lots of issues with ASPM; I wonder if
> this could account for some of them.
> 

I'm seeing this problem on Linux's ASPM code using powersave option where
each side of the link is having ASPM L0s enabled without coordination with
the other side. I'm wondering if you are hitting this too.

Legacy software (either operating system or firmware) that encounters 
the previously reserved value 00b (No ASPM Support), will most likely
refrain from enabling L1, which is intended behavior. 10 Legacy software
will also most likely refrain from enabling L0s for that component’s 
Transmitter (also intended behavior), but it is unclear if such software
will also refrain from enabling L0s for the component on the other side 
of the Link. 

If software enables L0s on one side when the component on 
the other side does not indicate that it supports L0s, the result is 
undefined. 

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ