lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKn9XyutRAk4Hf5tarQVkCQ4QQL3wtM5RHYfsMg8P3mhnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2016 12:09:56 -0400
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
	"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>, "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
	"linux@...izon.com" <linux@...izon.com>,
	"Kaszewski, Marcin" <marcin.kaszewski@...el.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v7] x86, suspend: Save/restore extra MSR registers for suspend

+mjg59, who may be seeing this issue on a skylake laptop

Chen-yu,

Great debugging, but I think there is a more general fix possible than
this DMI quirk.

I agree that in this example, a grantley server, it seems the BIOS is
erroneously
returning a bogus value of MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL on resume from S3.

But another scenario is also possible.  Consider a laptop that is resuming HOT
and the BIOS correctly enables throttling.  If this code were invoked, it would
restore the COLD setting.

Instead, it seems to me that the ACPI processor driver should upon .resume
check if throttling should be enabled or not, and proceed accordingly.
That would always do the "right thing", and would not need a DMI list.
Does that make sense?

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ