[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160524162207.GB3354@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 12:22:07 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, hofrat@...dl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] locking: Annotate spin_unlock_wait() users
Hello,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:17:13AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So don't talk about "acquire". And most certainly don't talk about
> "control dependencies". Not if we end up having things like *drivers*
> using this like in this example libata.
A delta but that particular libata usage is probably not needed now.
The path was used while libata was gradually adding error handlers to
the low level drivers. I don't think we don't have any left w/o one
at this point. I'll verify and get rid of that usage.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists