[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160524165006.GA28021@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:50:06 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Cc: "Bryant G. Ly" <bryantly@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"JBottomley@...n.com" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"mchehab@....samsung.com" <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
"jslaby@...e.com" <jslaby@...e.com>,
"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>, "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
bgly <bgly@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibmvscsis: Initial commit of IBM VSCSI Tgt Driver
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:44:43AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 09:34 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:25:05AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > +static inline long h_send_crq(struct ibmvscsis_adapter *adapter,
> > > > + u64 word1, u64 word2)
> > > > +{
> > > > + long rc;
> > > > + struct vio_dev *vdev = adapter->dma_dev;
> > > > +
> > > > + pr_debug("ibmvscsis: ibmvscsis_send_crq(0x%x, 0x%016llx, 0x%016llx)\n",
> > > > + vdev->unit_address, word1, word2);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > As Joe Perches already asked, please define pr_fmt() instead of including
> > > the kernel module name in every pr_debug() statement.
> >
> > Even better, as this is a driver, it should be using dev_*() calls
> > instead of pr_*() calls to properly identify the device and driver that
> > is making the message. No driver should be using pr_*() except in
> > _very_ limited usages.
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> The reason I recommended pr_debug() is because ibmvscsis is a LIO target
> driver and I don't think a struct device is associated with a LIO target
> driver. See e.g. target_register_template() in
> drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c.
That seems messed up, there should be a struct device somewhere to
use...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists