lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5744AA15.8010306@intel.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 22:23:01 +0300 From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> Cc: jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf pt: Mark PT return events as "return" On 24/05/2016 10:05 p.m., Andi Kleen wrote: >>> What about beautifying the sample flags i.e. instead of displaying the >>> letters interpret them into something more human readable e.g. >> >> Looks like a good idea, but can't this be done on top of what he sent? > > Yes it both makes sense together. OK I will look at the patch tomorrow. It looks like it synths 2 samples for each return (one "branches" and one "return"), which I would expect would mess up the thread_stack pairing calls and returns. Did you intend to have 2 samples?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists