[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5744AA15.8010306@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 22:23:01 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf pt: Mark PT return events as "return"
On 24/05/2016 10:05 p.m., Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> What about beautifying the sample flags i.e. instead of displaying the
>>> letters interpret them into something more human readable e.g.
>>
>> Looks like a good idea, but can't this be done on top of what he sent?
>
> Yes it both makes sense together.
OK I will look at the patch tomorrow.
It looks like it synths 2 samples for each return (one "branches" and
one "return"), which I would expect would mess up the thread_stack pairing
calls and returns. Did you intend to have 2 samples?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists