lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20160524194302.GK2735@f23x64.localdomain> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 12:43:02 -0700 From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org> To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> Cc: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, dbasehore@...gle.com, vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] platform:x86: Add PMC Driver for Intel Core SoC On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:07:32PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Rajneesh Bhardwaj > > <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com> wrote: > > >> +static int pmc_core_dev_state_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused) > >> +{ > >> + struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private; > >> + u32 counter_val; > >> + > >> + counter_val = pmc_core_reg_read(pmcdev, > >> + SPT_PMC_SLP_S0_RES_COUNTER_OFFSET); > >> + seq_printf(s, "%u\n", pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step(counter_val)); > >> + > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static int pmc_core_dev_state_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > >> +{ > >> + return single_open(file, pmc_core_dev_state_show, inode->i_private); > >> +} > >> + > >> +static const struct file_operations pmc_core_dev_state_ops = { > >> + .open = pmc_core_dev_state_open, > >> + .read = seq_read, > >> + .llseek = seq_lseek, > >> + .release = single_release, > >> +}; > > > > I suppose DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE might reduce amount of LOC. > > Correction: > DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE() Andy caught the couple things I was going to add and a couple more. Please give his feedback one more pass (except where I noted we had already covered things like the header and the module build), and we should still be able to get this into 4.7 if I have the next rev by tomorrow. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists