lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CANRm+CyRS883Ne1XEX_dO=GKAN5vZZZ0HDZx4e5rB32c1s8Zow@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:25:36 +0800 From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> To: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: halt-polling: poll if emulated lapic timer will fire soon 2016-05-24 10:19 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>: > 2016-05-24 2:01 GMT+08:00 David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>: >> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> wrote: >>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com> >> >> I'm ok with this patch, but I'd like to better understand the target >> workloads. What type of workloads do you expect to benefit from this? > > dynticks guests I think is one of workloads which can get benefit, > there are lots of upcoming fire timers captured by my feature. Even > during TCP testing. And also the workload of Yang's. Do you think I should add an module parameter to enable/disable it during module insmod or current patch is fine? Regards, Wanpeng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists