linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: st_sensors: Init trigger before irq request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 May 2016 23:54:43 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Crestez Dan Leonard <leonard.crestez@...el.com>
Cc:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
	Giuseppe Barba <giuseppe.barba@...com>,
	Denis Ciocca <denis.ciocca@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: st_sensors: Init trigger before irq request

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Crestez Dan Leonard
<leonard.crestez@...el.com> wrote:
> [Me]
>> However I think my patch fixing the thread issue will collide
>> by being close in context to this so it'd be great if you
>> could resend it on top of
>> "iio: st_sensors: switch to a threaded interrupt"?
>
> I checked my local git tree and this was already on top of v6 of that
> patch.

OK no problem then.

> I think this issue is much less likely to cause problems without
> it.

Yeah.

> Perhaps it should be incorporated into your patch?

No better keep them separate.

Yours,
Linus Walleij