lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ4f9XPZ6kF2QV4TNaX4KPmzDBYBGo+pXgKw06EzbEtkA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 23:54:43 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Crestez Dan Leonard <leonard.crestez@...el.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>, Giuseppe Barba <giuseppe.barba@...com>, Denis Ciocca <denis.ciocca@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: st_sensors: Init trigger before irq request On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Crestez Dan Leonard <leonard.crestez@...el.com> wrote: > [Me] >> However I think my patch fixing the thread issue will collide >> by being close in context to this so it'd be great if you >> could resend it on top of >> "iio: st_sensors: switch to a threaded interrupt"? > > I checked my local git tree and this was already on top of v6 of that > patch. OK no problem then. > I think this issue is much less likely to cause problems without > it. Yeah. > Perhaps it should be incorporated into your patch? No better keep them separate. Yours, Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists