lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <2D6D38D9-FE06-4115-8FB2-48CB2FB19809@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 17:31:51 -0500 From: Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@...eaurora.org> To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Regression in 4.6.0-git - bisected to commit dd254f5a382c > On May 24, 2016, at 2:36 PM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> wrote: > > On 05/24/2016 02:25 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: >> On May 24, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> wrote: >>> >>> On 05/24/2016 02:13 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: >>>> I’m seeing this too, same commit if you want another person to test/reproduce. >>> >>> If you do a pull today, does that fix your problem? >> >> Hmm, no. Which commit am I looking for? I’m on a56f489502e28caac56c8a0735549740f0ae0711 > > Commit 84787c572d402644dca4874aba73324d9f8e3948 is working for me. I have a fixup in lib/iov_iter.c with a dump_stack() call if the fixup was needed. That dump is not triggered. I do not seem to have a56f489502e yet. Still seeing the issue on top of tree and the above commit. Re-ran bisection just to be sure. -M
Powered by blists - more mailing lists