[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1464150590-2703-1-git-send-email-jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 13:29:50 +0900
From: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
To: robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: r64343@...escale.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
grant.likely@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, jaewon31.kim@...il.com,
Jaewon <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: [RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA alignment
not to affect dma-coherent
From: Jaewon <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
There was an alignment mismatch issue for CMA and it was fixed by
commit 1cc8e3458b51 ("drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the alignment with CMA setup").
However the way of the commit considers not only dma-contiguous(CMA) but also
dma-coherent which has no that requirement.
This patch checks more to distinguish dma-contiguous(CMA) from dma-coherent.
Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
---
drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
index ed01c01..45b873e 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
@@ -127,7 +127,10 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_alloc_size(unsigned long node,
}
/* Need adjust the alignment to satisfy the CMA requirement */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMA) && of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "shared-dma-pool"))
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMA)
+ && of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "shared-dma-pool")
+ && of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reusable", NULL)
+ && !of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "no-map", NULL)) {
align = max(align, (phys_addr_t)PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order));
prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "alloc-ranges", &len);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists