linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4 v7] ASoC: dwc: Add PIO PCM extension

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57457A63.5060702@synopsys.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2016 11:11:47 +0100
From:	Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC:	<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
	<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v7] ASoC: dwc: Add PIO PCM extension

Hi Mark,


On 24-05-2016 18:51, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:07:14PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> On 24-05-2016 17:41, Mark Brown wrote:
> Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
> substantially less than 80 columns.  Doing this makes your messages much
> easier to read and reply to.
>
>>>>  	if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
>>>>  		i2s_write_reg(dev->i2s_base, ITER, 1);
>>> That seems wrong, or at least something that should be separate?
>>> Previously we needed interrupts for DMA operation but now we enable
>>> interrupts only if we don't use DMA.  It feels like we want to make the
>>> change for DMA separately if only to make it clear for bisection, are we
>>> 100% sure that masking the interrupt won't also mask the DMA request
>>> signals?
>> Indeed I thought about this and the interrupts must also be enabled when in DMA
>> mode. Although there is no interrupt handler in the original driver (without
>> this patches) in some setups the interrupt line may be connected to the DMA
>> controller. I will drop this change and always enable interrupts. Please note
>> that I don't have a setup with DMA support so I can only test using the PIO mode.
> Presumably you can talk to your hardware colleagues and get them to make
> you a FPGA with a DMA IP available?

Its already in the todo list.

>
>>> This also seems wrong.  We're forcing PIO if an interrupt is provided
>>> rather than based on DMA being configured which means that if the
>>> interrupt is wired up and happens to be described in DT we'll get worse
>> How should I then determine which mode to use?
>>     - Check if DMA parameters are declared in DT, or
>>     - Check if snd_dmaengine_pcm_register() fails, or
>>     - Assume PIO mode will be used when compiling with PIO PCM, or
>>     - Something else ?
> You could either unconditionally register the PIO driver and only
> actually start using it if the driver is instantiated or you could check
> to see if the registration function works (handling deferred probe - if
> the DMA driver just didn't load yet you should wait for it).

I think I will take the second option. Something like this:
"
    ret = snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(...)
    if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
        return ret;
    else
        pio_register(...);
"?


Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu