linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Add CFGCHIP syscon platform declaration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5745893C.5040603@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2016 16:45:08 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	<khilman@...nel.org>
CC:	<petr@...ix.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Add CFGCHIP syscon platform
 declaration.

On Tuesday 10 May 2016 10:14 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 05/10/2016 06:26 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> On 5/10/2016 2:46 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>>
>>> The CFGCHIP registers are used by a number of devices, so using a syscon
>>> device to share them. The first consumer of this will by the
>>> phy-da8xx-usb
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> index 725e693..69d11a1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>>   * (at your option) any later version.
>>>   */
>>>  #include <linux/init.h>
>>> +#include <linux/platform_data/syscon.h>
>>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>  #include <linux/dma-contiguous.h>
>>>  #include <linux/serial_8250.h>
>>> @@ -1109,3 +1110,30 @@ int __init da850_register_sata(unsigned long
>>> refclkpn)
>>>      return platform_device_register(&da850_sata_device);
>>>  }
>>>  #endif
>>> +
>>> +static struct syscon_platform_data da8xx_cfgchip_platform_data = {
>>> +    .label    = "cfgchip",
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct resource da8xx_cfgchip_resources[] = {
>>> +    {
>>> +        .start    = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_CFGCHIP0_REG,
>>> +        .end    = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_CFGCHIP4_REG + 3,
>>> +        .flags    = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>>> +    },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct platform_device da8xx_cfgchip_device = {
>>> +    .name    = "syscon",
>>> +    .id    = 0,
>>
>>     Again, -1.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> MBR, Sergei
>>
> 
> I wish you would have noticed this when I first submitted it. I remember
> going back and forth about this. But it has been too long and I can't
> remember the reason why I chose to go this way.
> 
> It seems like changing it broke something with either this one or the
> phy device and I opted to keep it this way on both to be consistent. For
> example, the USB devices both use id = 0 as well even though there are
> only one of each type.

Agree with Sergei here. Can you confirm what broke exactly? I think the
USB needs to be fixed too.

Thanks,
Sekhar