linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: stats: Walk online CPUs with CPU offline/online locked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160525020759.GZ17585@vireshk-i7>
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2016 07:37:59 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: stats: Walk online CPUs with CPU
 offline/online locked

On 25-05-16, 02:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I'm actually considering making the stats code non-modular.
> 
> It won't have a reason to use notifiers then and may be simplified
> quite a bit this way.  As an added benefit, if it doesn't use the
> transition notifier, it won't interfere with fast frequency switching
> in the schedutil governor any more.
> 
> Are there any drawbacks?

I don't think so. Please do that :)

-- 
viresh