lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2016 09:08:51 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, alistair.francis@...inx.com,
	Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	gerg@...ux-m68k.org, jlayton@...chiereds.net,
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	michal.simek@...inx.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	uclinux-h8-devel@...ts.sourceforge.jp, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] String hash improvements

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:20 AM, George Spelvin
<linux@...encehorizons.net> wrote:
>
> Well, they're close, and I can and did *get* them ready.

Ok, thanks. For some odd reason all your emails in this series got
marked as spam. Every single one, including the cover letter (but not
your replies to the replies to this).

Stupidly, I unmarked them before thinking to ask google *why* they got
marked as spam.

Did you do something different to send this series than you usually do?

Would you mind sending it again (maybe you have changes due to some o
the comments, but even if not, I'd like to see what the spam filter
says)? You could do it just to me to avoid filling up the mailing list
with duplicates.

                    Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists