linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] String hash improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADWXX_F0jOjui1iHti1eC6tsD+cwMzZ0T_16e9nCzAK6raFxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2016 09:08:51 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, alistair.francis@...inx.com,
	Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	gerg@...ux-m68k.org, jlayton@...chiereds.net,
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	michal.simek@...inx.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	uclinux-h8-devel@...ts.sourceforge.jp, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] String hash improvements

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:20 AM, George Spelvin
<linux@...encehorizons.net> wrote:
>
> Well, they're close, and I can and did *get* them ready.

Ok, thanks. For some odd reason all your emails in this series got
marked as spam. Every single one, including the cover letter (but not
your replies to the replies to this).

Stupidly, I unmarked them before thinking to ask google *why* they got
marked as spam.

Did you do something different to send this series than you usually do?

Would you mind sending it again (maybe you have changes due to some o
the comments, but even if not, I'd like to see what the spam filter
says)? You could do it just to me to avoid filling up the mailing list
with duplicates.

                    Linus